Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Borets Weatherford U.S., Inc. et al, No. 2:12-cv-00613 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 11, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00613, Dkt. No. 59
Decided
September 11, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - denying 13 Motion to Dismiss
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Weatherford In ternational Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Dkt. No. 13, filed December 24, 2012). The Magistrate Judge file d a report recommending that the motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. N o. 56, filed September 23, 2013). No objections having been filed and for the reasons set fort h in the Court’s Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED.