Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wi-Lan Inc. v. Apple, Inc. et al, No. 2:12-cv-00600 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 3, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00600, Dkt. No. 340
Decided
April 3, 2014
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; the Court GRANTS-IN-PART Wi-LAN's motion for judgment as a matter of law and finds that claims 1 and 10 of the '802 patent are not invalid. In all other respects, Wi-LANs motion is DENIED. Accordingly, the Cour…
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Wi-LAN Inc.’s (“Wi-LAN”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under FRCP 50(b) or, in the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial Under FRCP 59 (Dkt. No. 635). In it, Wi-LAN moves the Court to overturn the jury ’s verdict and find the as serted patent to be valid and to find that Apple Inc. (“Apple”) infringes both of the asserted claims as a matter of law. Wi-LAN filed this patent infringement action against Apple Inc. (“Apple”) on February 2, 2011, accusing the iPhone and iPad devices of infr inging claims 1 and 10 of U.S. Patent No.