Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TQP Development, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated, No. 2:12-cv-00570 (E.D. Tex. July 13, 2013)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00570, Dkt. No. 60
Decided
July 13, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 34 Adobe Systems Incorporated's Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs Counsel (Russ, August and Kabat)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Currently before the Court is Adobe Systems Incorporated’s Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff’s Counsel (Dkt. No. 34), filed on January 16, 2013. The matter came on for hearing on July 12, 2013. For the reasons assigned in Open Court and summ arized herein, the Motion is GRANTED as to Marc A. Fenster and the Ru ss August & Kabat law firm (“RAK”), but is withdrawn as to the Spangler & Fussell law firm, and is declared moot as to the Ni Law Firm due to its withdrawal from the case.