Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

DietGoal Innovations LLC v. El Pollo Loco Inc, No. 2:12-cv-00568 (E.D. Tex. July 16, 2013)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00568, Dkt. No. 54
Decided
July 16, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - Court finds that Central District of California is a clearly more convenient venue. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case be transferred to the Central District of California
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant El Pollo Loco Inc.’s (“EPL”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the Central District of Calif ornia (Dkt. No. 3, filed August 31, 2012). EPL argues that the Central District of California is a clearly more convenient forum for this case. Plaintiff DietGoal Innovations LLC opposes transfer. After considering all of the record evidence and weighing the various factors, the Court finds that the Central District of California is a clearly more convenient venue.