Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Dunkin' Brands Group, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00566 (E.D. Tex. July 2, 2013)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00566, Dkt. No. 50
Decided
July 2, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - After considering all of the relevant evidence and factors, the Court finds that Eastern District of Virginia is a clearly more convenient venue. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case be transferred to the Eastern Dis…
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Dunkin’ Br ands Group, Inc.’s (“ Dunkin’”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Massachuset ts (Dkt. No. 4, filed August 7, 2012). Dunkin’ argues that the District of Massachusetts is a clearly more convenient forum for this case. Plaintiff DietGoal Innovations LLC opposes transfer.