DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Hearst Communications, Inc. d/b/a Seventeen Magazine, No. 2:12-cv-00563 (E.D. Tex. June 20, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Hearst Commu nications, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Sever and Transfer to the S outhern District of New York (Dkt. No. 3, filed August 31, 2012). Hearst argues that the Southern District of New York is a clearly more convenient forum for this case. Plaintiff Diet Goal Innovations LLC opposes transfer.