Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Domino's Pizza, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00561 (E.D. Tex. July 10, 2013)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00561, Dkt. No. 55
Decided
July 10, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - ORDERED that this case be transferred to the Eastern District of Virginia
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Domino’s Pi zza, Inc.’s (“Domino”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the Eastern District of Michigan (D kt. No. 4, filed August 7, 2012). Domino argues that the Eastern District of Mich igan is a clearly more convenient forum for this case. Plaintiff DietGoal Innovations LLC opposes transfer.