RPost Holdings, Inc. et al v. Selligent, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00515 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is StrongMail Sy stems, Inc.’s (“St rongMail”) Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. No. 10). StrongMa il contends that the Northern District of California (NDCA) is a more convenient foru m than the Eastern District of Texas (EDTX). The Court, having considered the motion and related briefing, DENIES StrongMail’s motion to transfer venue because the balance of the private and public factors fails to demonstrate that the transferee venue is clearly more convenient. II.