Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Time, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00337 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2013)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00337, Dkt. No. 61
Decided
March 25, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - case be transferred to the Eastern District of Virginia
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Time Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Ve nue to the Southern District of New York (Dkt. No. 15, filed August 8, 2012). Time argues that the Southern District of New York is a clearly more convenient forum for this case. Plaint iff DietGoal Innovations LLC opposes transfer.