Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cardsoft (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC v. The Gores Group, LLC et al, No. 2:12-cv-00325 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 27, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00325, Dkt. No. 110
Decided
November 27, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
46 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On November 20, 2013, the Court held a heari ng to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patents No. 6,934,945 and 7,302,683. After considering the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 85, 93, and 97),1 the Court issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order.