Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC v. Imation Corp., No. 2:12-cv-00298 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00298, Dkt. No. 20
Decided
March 26, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Ima tion Corp.’s Renewed Motion to Transfer Venue or, Alternatively, to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 16.) Imation contends that the District of Minnesota is a more convenient forum than the Eastern District of Texas and seeks to transfer venue pursuant to Fed. R. Ci v. P. 12(b)(3) and 28 U.S. C. § 1404(a).