Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. et al, No. 2:12-cv-00207 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00207, Dkt. No. 241
Decided
March 29, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
36 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Allergan Sales, LLC’s (“Allergan”) Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 232), Sandoz, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Alcon Research, Ltd., and Falcon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.’s ( collectively, “Sandoz”) Respons ive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 235), and Allergan’s Reply Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 238). The Court held a hearing on March 2, 2016, to determine the proper construction of the disputed terms in this case.