Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00512 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00512, Dkt. No. 167
Decided
July 9, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
59 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On March 21, 2013, the Court held a claim cons truction hearing concerning U.S. Patent Nos. 7,204,386 (“the ‘386 patent”), 7,243,814 (“the ‘814 patent”), 7,789,263 (“the ‘263 patent”), 7,789,264 (“the ‘264 patent”), and RE 43,077 (“the ‘077 patent”), asserted by Plaintiff Luv n’ care, Ltd. (hereinafter “LNC”) against the Defendants, and U. S. Patent No. 6,305,570 (“the ‘570 patent”), asserted by Counterclaim Plaintiff Avent Ltd. (hereinafter “Avent”) against LNC.