Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SynQor, Inc. et al v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00444 (E.D. Tex. June 12, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00444, Dkt. No. 126
Decided
June 12, 2012
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 123
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct.