Princeton Digital Image Corporation v. Facebook, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00400 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2012)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”), ImageShack Corporation (“Imageshack”), Corbis C orporation (“Corbis”), Getty Images, Inc. (“Getty Images”) and Photobucket.com, Inc.’s (“Photobucket”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Transfer Venue. (Dkt. No. 62.) Defendants contend that the Northern District of California (“NDCA”) is a more convenient forum than the Eastern District of Texas ( “EDTX”) and they seek a transfer to NDCA pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Id.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error