Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Negotiated Data Solutions, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00390 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00390, Dkt. No. 150
Decided
December 11, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - denying Apple Inc's motion to sever and transfer claims
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Sever and Transfer Claims to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Dkt. No. 97). After carefully considering the parties’ writt en submissions and the argument of counsel, the Court DENIES the Motion. II. Facts and Procedural Background On September 7, 2011, Negotiated Data Solutions, Inc. (“NData”) sued Apple and five other groups of Defendants alleging infringement of four patents based on the Defendants’ implementation of Universal Serial Bus (“USB”) technology.