Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 7, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00333, Dkt. No. 26
Decided
March 7, 2011
Judge
Koh, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER Seeking Clarification re 64 Joint Stipulation for Stay and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Parties' Response Required by
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

SEEKING CLARIFICIATION REGARDING PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC. and SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS, LLC, Defendants.