Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Callpod, Inc. v. T Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00326 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00326, Dkt. No. 130
Decided
July 22, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On December 13, 2012, the Court held a hearin g to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 7,707,250. After considering the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in the parties’ cl aim construction briefing, the Court issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. APPLICABLE LAW “It is a ‘bedrock principle’ of patent law that ‘the claims of a patent define the invention to which the patentee is enti tled the right to exclude.’” Phillips v. AWH Corp. , 415 F.3d 1303, 1312 (Fed. Cir.