Lone Star Document Management, LLC v. Atalasoft, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00319 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 12, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Pending before the Court are Defendant Compulink Management Center, Inc.’s (“Compulink”) Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (D kt. No. 38) and Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Response To Defendant’s Notice of Supplemental Authority In Support of Rule 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss (Dkt. No. 76). For the reasons di scussed below, Compulink’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 38) is DENIED-IN-PART and GRANTED-IN-PART, and Compulink’s Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 76) is DENIED AS MOOT. II.