Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. Aetna Inc., et al, No. 2:11-cv-00285 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00285, Dkt. No. 174
Decided
August 15, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File its First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 119). The Court limits its ruling herein to the only issue properly before it at this time, Plaintiffs Motion for Leav…
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Phoenix Licensing, LLC and LPL Licensing, LLC’s (“Phoenix”) Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 119). For the reasons discussed below, Phoenix’s Motion is DENIED. II. Factual and Procedural Background On June 13, 2011, Phoenix filed a Complaint alleging patent infringement against several named defendants, including Liberty Mutual Insu rance Company (“LMIC”). (Dkt. No. 1). On November 11, 2011, Phoenix filed a Motion for Leav e to File a First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No.