Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

RPost Holdings, Inc. et al v. Kagan, No. 2:11-cv-00238 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2012)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00238, Dkt. No. 8
Decided
January 23, 2012
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for Alternative Service of Process Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) and directs RPost to serve process on Kagan under Rule 4(f)(3) by means of delivering the summons and complia…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction The Plaintiffs’ Motion for Alternative Service of Process Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) is before the Co urt. (Dkt. No. 7.) Upon due consideration, the Court GRANTS the Plaintiffs’ motion, to the extent and in the manner as set forth herein. II. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiffs RPost Holdings, Inc., RPost International Limited, and RMail Limited (collectively “RPost”) filed this action on April 29, 2011 seeking relief against Mr.