Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. Comcast Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00030 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00030, Dkt. No. 222
Decided
July 3, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
44 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On April 30, 2013, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,563,883 (herein after the “‘883 patent”). 1 A f t e r considering the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in the parties’ claim construction briefing, the Court issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. BACKGROUND The ‘883 patent is entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL MANAGEMENT AND SIGNALLING METHOD AND APPARATU S” and is based upon an a pplication filed July 18, 1994. Claims 1, 3-7, 10 and 12 are asserted.