Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00019 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00019, Dkt. No. 150
Decided
March 20, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER RE: AS TO MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES INC'S. VENUE MOTION
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Intervenor ARM, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), as it relates to Defendant Mindspeed Technologies, Inc., filed in Case No. 2:11-CV-19 (Dkt. No. 108, filed July 27, 2012), a nd ARM’s and Mindspeed’s identical Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a) filed in Case No. 2:12-CV-156 (Dkt. No. 29, filed July 27, 2012). This case is one of several related patent infringement cases involving Plaintiff Advanced Processor Technologies LLC (“APT”). Case No.