RPost Holdings, Inc. et al v. Readnotify.com Pty Ltd. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00016 (E.D. Tex. June 29, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Readnotify.c om Pty Ltd.’s (“Readnotify.com”) Motion to Stay Pending Patent Reexaminations and Trad emark Cancellation Procee dings (Dkt. No. 49). Upon considering the parties’ written submissions, the Court hereby addresses the motion. I. Factual Background Plaintiffs assert patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 (the “’219 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,571,334 (the “’334 patent”) agai nst Defendants. Plaintiffs also allege infringement of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,928,365 (the “’365 trademark”).