Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

KKG LLC v. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc., et al, No. 2:11-cv-00012 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00012, Dkt. No. 178
Decided
April 16, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, denying 144 MOTION for Reconsideration re 131 Order Provisional Opinion and Order filed by KKG LLC
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Pl aintiff KKG, LLC’s Opening Markman Brief (Dkt. No. 86), Defendants’ Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 94), and Plaintiff’s Amended Reply Brief (Dkt. No. 109). The Court held a hearing on November 26, 201 2, and issued a Provisional Opinion and Order on November 30, 2012 (Dkt. No. 131).