Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Edward D. Ioli Trust et al v. Avigilon Corporation et al, No. 2:10-cv-00605 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2012)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00605, Dkt. No. 279
Decided
November 16, 2012
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Granting #263 Motion to compel as set forth herein. Motions terminated: 263 SEALED MOTION Plaintiffs Edward D. Ioli Trust and General Traffic Controls, Inc.s Emergency Motion to Compel Source Code and Document…
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Edward D. Io li Trust and General Traffic Controls, Inc. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Emergency Motion to Compel Source Code and Document Production, filed October 25, 2012 (Dkt. No. 263) (“Motion”). The Court having considered same finds that the Motion should be GRANTED for the reasons set forth below. I. Factual and Procedural Background On December 30, 2010, Plaintiffs filed suit ag ainst Defendants Image Sensing Systems, Inc., CitySync Technologies, Inc., Coban Technologies, Inc., Vigilant Video, Inc.