GeoTag Inc v. Starbucks Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00572 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 7, 2014)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Defendant Domino’s Pizza, Inc.’s (“Domino’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-in fringement Based on Lack of Dynamic Replication and Geographical Areas (Dkt. No. 736, filed May 16, 2014.) The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be granted. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 834, filed August 5, 2014.) After reviewing the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendati on should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error