Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GeoTag Inc v. Starbucks Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00572 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 7, 2014)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00572, Dkt. No. 857
Decided
October 7, 2014
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 834 Report and Recommendations, 736 Sealed Motion filed by Domino's Pizza Inc
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Domino’s Pizza, Inc.’s (“Domino’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-in fringement Based on Lack of Dynamic Replication and Geographical Areas (Dkt. No. 736, filed May 16, 2014.) The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be granted. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 834, filed August 5, 2014.) After reviewing the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendati on should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED.