Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. v. Interwoven, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00490 (E.D. Tex. May 21, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00490, Dkt. No. 123
Decided
May 21, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, Motions Denies and terminated: 84 SEALED MOTION to Sever and Transfer Claims filed by LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA Inc, LG Electronics Inc
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is the motion of LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. and LG Electronics Inc.’s (“LG”) to Sever Claims and Transfer Venue (Dkt . No. 84). LG contends that joinder with Samsung under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 is improper in light of In re EMC (In re EMC I), 677 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2012). LG also contends that the District of New Jersey is a more convenient forum than the Eastern District of Texa s and seeks to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C.