Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC v. JVC Americas, Corp. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00474 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2011)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss Induced Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00474, Dkt. No. 78
Decided
September 30, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - ORDERED that Lenovos motion to dismiss Plaintiffs indirect infringement claims 52 is DENIED
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Ma gistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 77) has been presented for consideration. The report recommends that the court deny defendant Lenovo (United States) Inc.’s (“Lenovo”) Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s indirect infringement claims. Lenovo did not file objections to the report. The court is of the opinion that the conclusi ons of the Magistrate Judge are correct.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error