Texas Data Co., L.L.C. v. The Procter & Gamble Company, No. 2:10-cv-00417 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2010)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs‟ motion for attorney‟s fees and Plaintiffs‟ motion for costs. (Dkt. Nos. 51, 52.) ADT Security Services, Inc. (hereinafter “ADT” or “Defendant”) disputes Plaintiffs‟ motions and argues Plaintiffs‟ should recover no fees or costs . For the following reasons, the Court he reby GRANTS-in-part Plaintiffs‟ motions and holds that Plaintiffs should recover $163,497.80 in attorney‟s fees and $8,163.12 in costs. I. BACKGROUND Defendant ADT is an alarm company that specializes in installing and monitoring alarm systems.