Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Patent Group, LLC v. Johnny Ray, LLC et al, No. 2:10-cv-00380 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2010)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00380, Dkt. No. 8
Decided
November 1, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Relators Motion is GRANTED and the Court STRIKES Defendant Johnny Ray, LLCs Response to Qui Tam Complaint for False Marking (Dkt. No. 4), and ORDERS Defendant Johnny Ray,…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending b efore the Court is Relator Patent Group, LLC’s (“Patent Group”) Motion to Strike Johnny Ray’s Response to Complaint (Dkt. No. 6). The right to proceed pro se in civil actions is guaranteed by 28 U.S.C. § 1654: “In all courts of the United States the parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel as, by the rules of such courts, respectively, are permitted to manage and conduct causes therein.” However, this right is limited to appear pro se on behalf of one’s self; one cannot repre…