Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Patent Group, LLC v. The Brannock Device Co., Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00356 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 15, 2012)

Granted
Venue / Transfer
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00356, Dkt. No. 19
Decided
February 15, 2012
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - Considering all of the private and public interest factors, Defendants have shown that the Northern District of California is clearly more convenient than the Eastern District of Texas. Four of the § 1404(a) factors…
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court a re four related action s filed by Plaintiff Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC (“WRT”): (1) Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9, Inc., et al., No. 2:10-cv-364-JRG (“‘287 Patent Domestic Action”); (2) Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. Nokia Corporation, et al. , No. 2:10 -cv-365-JRG (“‘287 Patent International Action”); (3) Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9, Inc., et al. , No. 2:10 -cv-577 (“‘474 Patent Domestic Action”); and (4) Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error