Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

OPTi Inc. v. Silicon Integrated Systems Corp. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00279 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 30, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00279, Dkt. No. 388
Decided
January 30, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff OPTi, Inc.’s (“OPTi”) Rule 59(e) Motion to Amend the Court’s September 9, 2013 Final Judgment. The Defendants VIA Technologies, Inc. and VIA Technologies, Inc. (Taiwan) (collectively, “VIA”) oppose the Motion. For the reasons set forth below, OPTi’s Rule 59(e) Motion to Amend (Dkt. No. 311) is DENIED. BACKGROUND A jury trial was held in this case beginning on May 28, 2013. Dkt. No. 281. The jury returned a unanimous verdict on May 31, 2013. Dkt. No. 274.