Rmail Limited v. Amazon.Com, Inc., et al, No. 2:10-cv-00258 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2011)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant s Amazon.com, Inc.‟s (“Amazon”) and PayPal, Inc.‟s (“Paypal”) motion to transfer. (Dkt. No. 25.) The Court, having considered the venue motion and the arguments of counsel, DENIES the motion to transfer venue to the Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The balance of the private and public factors demonstrates that the transferee venue is not “clearly more convenient” than the venue chosen by Plaintiff Rmail Limited (“Rmail”) . See In re Volkswagen of Am., Inc.