Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Promote Innovation LLC v. Schering Corporation et al, No. 2:10-cv-00248 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 14, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00248, Dkt. No. 48
Decided
February 14, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS 29 Defendants Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of New Jersey, and DENIES AS MOOT 43 Dft's Motion to Amend Docket Control Order
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. No. 29) and Defendants’ Motion to Amend Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 43). Defendants in this case include Schering Corporation ( “Schering”) and Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”) (collectively “Defendants”) . The Court, having considered the venue motion and the arguments of counsel, GRANTS the motion to transfer venue for Defendants to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).