Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00224 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the court is defendants Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”), Fortinet, Inc. (“Fortinet”), WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. (“WatchGuard”), SonicWALL, Inc. (“SonicWALL”), and Deep Nines, Inc.’s (“Deep Nines”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to transfer venue (Dkt. No. 54). Defend ants contend that the Northern District of California is a more convenient forum than the Eastern District of Texas and seeks to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).