Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lake Cherokee Hard Drive Technologies, L.L.C. v. Bass Computers, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00216 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00216, Dkt. No. 198
Decided
February 13, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - denying defendant's motion for transfer
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants Bass Computers, Inc. (“Bass”), LSI Corp. (“LSI”), Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (“Marvell”), and Tech Data Corp. (“Tech Data”) (collectively “Defendants” 1) motion to transfer. (Dkt. No. 102.) The Defendants contend that the Northern District of California is a more convenient forum than the Eastern District of Texas and seek to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).