Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Keranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00207 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 12, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00207, Dkt. No. 399
Decided
September 12, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - (see order)
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court are motions to dismiss brought by numerous Defendnats. 1 Most of the motions to dismiss argue that Pl aintiff Keranos, LLC (“Keranos” or “Plaintiff”) lacks standing and, thus, that this suit should be dismissed pursu ant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). The majori ty of the Defendants’ motions also argue that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No.