Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Innoband, Inc. v. ASO Corp., No. 2:10-cv-00191 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2011)

Denied
Venue / Transfer
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00191, Dkt. No. 30
Decided
March 4, 2011
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - pending before the court is dft's Aso Corporation adn Aso LLC motion to transfer venue 22. The court DENIES, Aso's motion to transfer venue
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the court is defendants As o Corporation and Aso LLC’s (collectively “Aso”) motion to transfer venue (Dkt. No. 22). Aso contends that the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, is a more convenient forum than the Eastern District of Texas and, therefore, seeks to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error