Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Bluestone Innovations Texas LLC vs Epistar Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00171 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2011)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00171, Dkt. No. 127
Decided
September 30, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement (Dkt. No. 52) is DENIED
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magist rate Judge (Dkt. No. 121) has been presented for consideration. The report recommends that the court deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The report further recommends that the court deny Defendants’ request for a more definite statement. Defendants did not file objections to the report.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case