Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Promote Innovation LLC v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Inc, No. 2:10-cv-00121 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2010)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00121, Dkt. No. 22
Decided
August 9, 2010
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 16 Report and Recommendations, denying 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by RANBAXY LABORATORIES INC. and granting pltf to amend complaint
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 16), which contains his recommendation that the court deny the defendant Ranbaxy Laboratories, Inc.’s (“Ranbaxy”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 8), and instead grant leave for the plaintiff Promote Innovation LLC (“Promote”) to amend its complaint, has been presented for consideration. On August 2, 2010, Promote objected to Judge Everingham’s report and recommendation (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error