Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Akzenta Paneele + Profile GmbH et al vs Shaw Industries Group Inc et al, No. 2:10-cv-00016 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2011)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Inequitable Conduct Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00016, Dkt. No. 80
Decided
September 30, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, it is 2ORDERED that Plaintiffs motions to dismiss and/or strike Defendants inequitable conduct counterclaims and affirmative defenses are deemed motions for a more definite statement.…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Ma gistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 77) has been presented for consideration. The report recommends that the court construe Plaintiffs’ motions to dismiss and/or strike Defendants’ inequitable conduct counterclaims and affirmative defenses as motions for a more defin ite statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error