Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

C2 Communications Technologies, Inc. v. Paetec Corporation, No. 2:09-cv-00393 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 22, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00393, Dkt. No. 78
Decided
December 22, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay granting 59 Motion to Transfer Case to Other District and finding as moot 59 Motion to Sever (terminates case) (dma, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Oklahoma Eastern on 12/22/2009.].
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant, PAETEC Corporation (“PAETEC”), has moved the Court to transfer this patent infringement action to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York or, in the alternative, to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). PAETEC’s request for transfer is part of its Amended Motion to Sever and Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 59). In its original Motion to Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 41), PAETEC, along with then co-defendants Matrix Telecom, Inc.