Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Large Audience Display Systems, LLC v. Tennman Productions, LLC et al, No. 2:09-cv-00356 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2011)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00356, Dkt. No. 95
Decided
March 30, 2011
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - granting Defendants motion to transfer venue to the Central District of California
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. BACKGROUND In November of 2009, Plaintiff brought the present action against Tennman Productions, LLC (“Tennman”), Justin Timberlake (“Timber lake”), The Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. (“the Lakers”), Britney Touring, Inc. (“Britney Touring”), and Britney Spears (“Spears”), and later amended its complaint to include Steve Dixon (“Dixon”) and Musical Tour Management, Inc. (“MTM”) (collectively, “Defendants”).1 Plaintiff alleges that Defendants infringe United States Patent No. 6,669,346 (“the ‘346 patent”).