Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

T-Netix, Inc. v. Pinnacle Public Services LLC, No. 2:09-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00333, Dkt. No. 45
Decided
September 30, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - for reasons stated herein, the court DENIES Pinnacle's motion to transfer
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Background Plaintiff T-Netix, Inc. (“T-Netix”) brought suit against Pinnacle Public Services, LLC (“Pinnacle”) in October of 2009 and amended its original complaint three days later. Pinnacle filed the present motion seeking a transfer to the Northern District of Texas in January of 2010. (Dkt. No. 12). Pinnacle seeks transfer for improper venue under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(3) and for convenience under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Pinnacle’s motion to transfer. II.