Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Weatherford International, Inc. et al v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. et al, No. 2:09-cv-00261 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00261, Dkt. No. 139
Decided
August 5, 2011
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Weatherford International, Inc. and Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. (collectively, “Weatherford”) filed suit against Halliburton En ergy Services, Inc. and General Plastics & Composites, L.P. (collectively, “Halliburton” or “Defendants”) on August 27, 2009, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,712,153 (“the ’153 Patent”) and 7,124,831 (“the ’831 Patent”). On May 21, 2010, Hall iburton counter-claimed agai nst Weatherford alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,695,050 (“the ’050 Patent”) and 5,540,279 (“the ’279 Patent”).