Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Traffic Information, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc. et al, No. 2:09-cv-00246 (E.D. Tex. June 21, 2010)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00246, Dkt. No. 113
Decided
June 21, 2010
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 102 Report and Recommendations. the defendants motions to dismiss or for a more definite statement are DENIED
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 102), which contains his recommendation that the c ourt deny the defendant American Automobile Association, Inc.’s (“AAA”) motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim, or alternatively, for a more definite statement (Dkt. Nos. 25, 85), has been presented for consideration. On April 27, 2010, AAA filed an objection to Judge Everingham’s report and recommendation (Dkt. No.