Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Microbes, Inc. et al v. The Espoma Company et al, No. 2:09-cv-00237 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00237, Dkt. No. 82
Decided
April 12, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court held a Markman hearing on March 23, 2011. After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues.The court adopt…
Length
36 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION The court held a Markman hearing on March 23, 2011. After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues. II. OVERVIEW OF THE PATENTS AND TECHNOLOGY Plaintiffs Microbes, Inc. and Rhizogen L.L.C. (“Plaintiffs”) filed this suit against defendants The Espoma Company, Advanced Mi crobial Solutions L.L.C. (“AMS”), and Calloway’s Nursery, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.