Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Collins et al v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:09-cv-00219 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00219, Dkt. No. 383
Decided
September 23, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms and disputed phrases of the patents-in- suit
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Carl Collins and Farzin Davanloo (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed suit on July 15, 2009 , alleging that Western Digital Technologies, Inc., (“Western Digital”), Hitach i, Ltd. (“Hitachi”), Hitachi America, Ltd. (“Hitachi America”), Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc. (“Hitachi Global Storage”) (collectively, Hitachi, Hitachi America, and Hitachi Global Storage shall be referred to as the “Hitachi Defendants”), Toshiba Corp oration (“Toshiba”), Toshiba America, Inc.