Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rembrandt Vision Technologies L P v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc, No. 2:09-cv-00200 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 28, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00200, Dkt. No. 67
Decided
April 28, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 327 Patent. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction…
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. (―Rembrandt‖) filed suit against Defendant Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (―JJVC‖) for patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,712,327 (―the ‗327 Patent‖). This Memorandum Opinion and Order outlines the Court‘s claim construction for the four disputed terms in the ‗327 Patent. I.